Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Traffic Code 18.2-266 Second Offense

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Robert v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant challenged a judgment from the Circuit Court in Virginia Beach (Virginia), which convicted defendant of second offense driving under the influence (DUI). 

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In order to convict a defendant, it is necessary that the Commonwealth establish two things: (1) that defendant was operating or driving a motor vehicle, and (2) that he was under the influence of intoxicants at the time he was driving or operating it. Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 makes it unlawful to drive or operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
  • To prove that an accused is guilty of violating Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, it is not necessary to show that the vehicle was "moved" or "driven" from one place to another. The word "operate," as used in § 18.2-266, is not limited to movement of the vehicle. The prosecution need only show an accused was under the influence of alcohol, or had an excessive blood alcohol content, and while in that condition, was "in actual physical control of the vehicle."
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, September 15, 2014

Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Traffic Driving Influence Blood Test

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Richardson v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). He appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The implied consent law operates to permit the taking and testing of blood from an unconscious driver and that incoherence or unconsciousness does not constitute a refusal, reasonable or unreasonable, because consent is continuing. The taking of blood is permitted, but nothing suggests it is mandated.
  • Test results from a breath or blood test are not necessary or required to prove driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
  • The result of a breath analysis is but auxiliary proof which may tend to corroborate evidence of the objective symptoms of intoxication. 
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, August 25, 2014

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Traffic Code 18.2-266

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Moon v. Commonwealth

Facts:

In a drunk driving case, the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach (Virginia) convicted defendant of driving under the influence of alcohol, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, and maiming another person while driving under the influence of alcohol, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-51.4. At first, the appellate court reversed his convictions, but the appellate court had since granted the Commonwealth's petition for a rehearing en banc, stayed the prior decision, and reinstated the appeal.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Under familiar principles of appellate review, an appellate court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences fairly deducible from that evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the party that prevailed below.
  • The results of a blood or breath test provided by the implied consent law, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.2, are admissible against an accused in a trial for driving under the influence of alcohol only so long as the accused has first been validly arrested. Absent a valid, timely arrest, the Commonwealth has no right to collect the blood or breath sample in the first place and, a fortiori, even less right to offer into evidence test results based on the sample. If an accused is not validly arrested prior to the taking of his blood, his consent for blood alcohol testing is not implied, and his actual consent based upon a belief, generated by the officer's recitation of the implied consent law, that he was bound to submit to a test is invalid. Thus, an untimely arrest results in exclusion of the certificate of analysis of the blood.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, August 22, 2014

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Traffic Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Robert v. Commonwealth

Facts:

In a drunk driving case, the Court of Appeals (Virginia) entered a judgment that affirmed defendant's conviction in Virginia Beach following a bench trial for driving under the influence of a narcotic drug in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The construction of a statute presents a question of law that a reviewing court reviews de novo upon appeal. When a court construes a penal statute, the court must not add to the words of that statute, nor ignore the statute's actual words, and the court must strictly construe the statute and limit its application to cases clearly within the scope of that statute. Also, every part of a statute is presumed to have some effect and no part will be considered meaningless unless absolutely necessary.
  • A reviewing court must assume that the General Assembly chose, with care, the words it used in enacting the statute, and it is bound by those words when it applies the statute.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, August 18, 2014

Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Traffic Blood Test Driving Influence

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Barney v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. He appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The implied consent law operates to permit the taking and testing of blood from an unconscious driver and that incoherence or unconsciousness does not constitute a refusal, reasonable or unreasonable, because consent is continuing. The taking of blood is permitted, but nothing suggests it is mandated.
  • Test results from a breath or blood test are not necessary or required to prove driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. 
  • The result of a breath analysis is but auxiliary proof which may tend to corroborate evidence of the objective symptoms of intoxication.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, August 15, 2014

Virginia Beach DUI Lawyers Traffic Violation Code 18.2-266 Speeding

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Foreman v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach (Virginia) of DUI in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. He had previously pled guilty to speeding in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-870. Both charges arose from the same course of driving. He asserted that the DUI conviction was barred by Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 because the speeding conviction constituted a conviction for reckless driving.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 provides that whenever any person is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol and reckless driving growing out of the same act or acts and is convicted of one of these charges, the court shall dismiss the remaining charge.
  • Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862 provides that a person shall be guilty of reckless driving who drives a motor vehicle at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more in excess of the applicable maximum speed limit of forty miles per hour or more.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. 
Sunday, April 27, 2014

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Traffic Violation Code 18.2-266

Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Mason v. Commonwealth

Facts:

In a drunk driving case, the Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Virginia Beach (Virginia) of driving under the influence (DUI) and aggravated involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-266 and 18.2-36.1(B), respectively. He appealed.

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 provides that if an arrestee for driving under the influence refuses repeatedly to submit to blood or breath testing after being advised of the possible consequences of such refusal, no blood or breath samples shall be taken, and if charged with unreasonably refusing to submit to such testing, the arrestee may introduce evidence to try to establish that his refusal was reasonable.
  • Where an arresting officer has probable cause to believe an incoherent or unconscious driver has violated Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol, the implied consent law, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.2, operates to permit the taking and testing of blood from that driver. Incoherence or unconsciousness does not constitute a refusal, reasonable or unreasonable, because consent is continuing.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Email Us:

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message:

Our Phone #

Virginia Beach

Virginia beach 757-512-5002
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Popular Posts

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.