Saturday, April 12, 2014
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Traffic Violation
Virginia Beach
Drunk Driving Lawyers
Below is a sample case of
traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been charged with a
traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
Are you concerned about the
consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?
We have defended many traffic
tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get
the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Thomas v. Commonwealth
Facts:
A general district court
found defendant guilty of drunk driving in violation of Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-266. Defendant appealed. A jury in the circuit court found defendant
guilty as charged. The Circuit Court of Virginia Beach (Virginia) denied
defendant's motion to set aside the verdict and entered final judgment.
Defendant appealed.
If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-266(i), prohibits driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08
percent or more by weight by volume or 0.08 grams or more per 210 liters
of breath.
- A DUI verdict finding an
accused guilty "as charged" in a warrant citing Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-266 requires that an appellate court address on appeal both Va. Code
Ann. § 18.2-266(i) and (ii).
- Va. Code Ann. §
18.2-266(i) permits a factfinder to infer that the blood alcohol concentration
(BAC) level determined by a timely breath test accurately states the BAC
level at the time of driving. While sometimes called a "rebuttable
presumption," the later-BAC-implies-prior-BAC principle underlying §
18.2-266(i) is no more than a permissible evidentiary inference that the
factfinder may accept or reject. Understood that way, the inference
violates no constitutional norms.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
Our law firm has the
necessary experience to assist you with this matter. We will do our absolute best to help you get the
best result possible based on the facts of your case.
Disclaimer:
Email Us:
Our Phone #
Popular Posts
-
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
-
Virginia Beach Drunk Driving Lawyers Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm. ...
Powered by Blogger.